[경영] KT 조직구조 분석(영문)
- 등록일 / 수정일
- 페이지 / 형식
- 자료평가
- 구매가격
- 2018.08.29 / 2018.08.29
- 10페이지 / docx (MS워드 2007이상)
- 평가한 분이 없습니다. (구매금액의 3%지급)
- 2,000원
최대 20페이지까지 미리보기 서비스를 제공합니다.
자료평가하면 구매금액의 3%지급!
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
추천 연관자료
- 목차
-
I. Introduction: Corporation KT
II. Problems
1. Dogmatic and Powerful Executives
2. Imbalance of Strategy and Organizations Structure
3. Competitive Domestic Market Environment.
III. Our Recommendations
1. Disperse Executives power and Use virtual network system.
2. Change structure based on functional structure and Apply organic structure specific departments, enhance communication by horizontal linkages.
3. Turn eyes to abroad with different Organization structure and Cooperates with other company.
- 본문내용
-
I. Introduction: Corporation KT
KT was founded in 1981. after 1997, they reorganized their business structure from wire telephone centered structure to telecommunications and internet centered structure, and they expanded the telecommunications business. In 2002, they concentrated to construct high-speed internet. KT has building global network.
KT was the best telecommunication company in Korea but today they are controversy because of restructuring issue. KT pushed ahead huge change in their organization in last April. Why is this kind of major company reaching a crisis? we wonder what is the core problem of KT and we think we can look problems from a business administration perspective, especially formation design perspective.
Therefore, we want to check what their problem is and we try to suggest how to solve those problems.
II. Problems
Problem 1) Dogmatic and Powerful Executives, strategic and ethical problems of organizational culture
In 2002, government privatized a public enterprise of KT for strengthening competitiveness of communication business. Although KT was privatized for change, KT’s overall culture had vestiges of public enterprise yet. There were lots of request for executive appointment and also they often employ people through the nepotism. These problems cut off communication between executives and employees. Finally it caused executives’ dogmatic decision making. In 2011, they sell off NTC invested 15 years that brought a profit of 20 billion won annually. Also they invest hundreds of billions in Africa suddenly and sell ‘Mukunghwa satellite 1,2’ without government approval. It was not convinced by employees in common sense. Executives’ uncomprehend and dogmatic decision making made employees distrust.
자료평가
-
아직 평가한 내용이 없습니다.
오늘 본 자료
더보기
최근 판매 자료
- 인간관계론 기업의 인적관리
- 롯데리아 서비스 사례(청사진, 피시본 분석 포함)
- 서대문구 지역탐방보고서
- 서대문장애인종합복지관 실습기관분석보고서
- [무역관계법] Korea vs US - DRAMs 사건
- [투자론] 포트폴리오 이론
- 수직계열화,현대자동차의환경분석,현대자동차의전략,수직계열화분석,현대자동차의수직계열화
- 신라호텔 성공요인과 신라호텔 경영전략과 마케팅 SWOT,7P전략분석및 신라호텔 미래발전방향 제시
- 마케팅관리론_마케팅 조사의 과정에 대해 단계별로 정리하고 각 단계별로 주요 특징을 제시하고 실제 사례를 중심으로 본인 의견을 기술하세요
- [노사관계론] 현대자동차 2006년 6월 파업에 대한 조사
저작권 관련 사항 정보 및 게시물 내용의 진실성에 대하여 레포트샵은 보증하지 아니하며, 해당 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재·배포는 금지됩니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견시 고객센터에 신고해 주시기 바랍니다.