미국대학 과제_철학_칸트와 흄의 도덕 논쟁_Being Moral, Debate_Who are you with_Hume or Kant

미국을 보여줄 때 그들은 우리에게 단지 미국의 온갖 위대성과 장래성 가운데서도 지방색(provincialism)을 보여준다. 그러나 우리는 그러한 지방색을 영국 비국교도들에게서 제거하고 근절함을 목표로 한다(22). To the many who think that spirituality, and sweetness, and light, are moonshine, this will not appear to matter much; but with us, who value them, and who think that we have traced much of our present discomfort to the want of them, it weighs a great deal. So not only do we say that the Nonconformists have got provincial

for selection, but have omitted a number of noteworthy institutions. Nonetheless, the sophisticated (and affluent) patient can use this guide to identify the institution best suited to his or her needs anywhere in the country.Carol R. Glatt, N.J. Bioethics Commission, TrentonCopyright 1987 Reed Business Information, Inc. This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title. ➁An elegantly written book that broadens the history of hospitals and places it squarely within the larger field of American social history. Virginia G. Drachman, American Historical Review

who lacked educational and social opportunities. The affirmative action should be a temporary measure, but the time has not yet come to eliminate it. Educational opportunities for inner-city minority students still contrast dramatically with those of affluent students in the suburbs, where many white families live. (라) It has been the fashion in modern times to minimize the importance of innate differences between men and to ascribe all the important differences to the influence of environment. However important the latter may be, we must not overlook the fact that individuals are very dif

are also commonly called Puritans.Finally, the word puritanism has often been used as a term of abuse in a way that does scant justice to historical Puritanism?for instance, when a rigid moralism, or the condemnation of innocent pleasure, or religious narrowness, is stigmatized as puritanical.Even within the Church of England, a precise definition of Puritanism is elusive. The leading Puritan clergyman in Elizabeths reign was Thomas Cartwright, who denied he was one. He is particularly remembered for his advocacy of presbyterian polity; but Puritanism cannot be identified with presbyterian

과제인 것을 단지 확인하기 위하여 .3. To determine just what are the best methods by which to develop it , and the most clarifying political conceptions to carry with us into it .3 .그것을 개발한 가장 좋은 방법인 것을 단지 결정하기 위하여 ,그리고 그것안으로 우리들과 함께 운반하는 가장 많은 정화한 정치적인 개념 .Unless we know and settle these things , we shall set out without chart or compass .우리들이 이 것들을 알고 있고 그리고 놓지 않는다면, 우리들은 차트 혹은 콤파스 없이 시작하였