미국대학원_과제_애널리틱스, 빅데이터 문화_Columbia Univ_Analytics Culture

  • 등록일 / 수정일
  • 페이지 / 형식
  • 자료평가
  • 구매가격
  • 2021.01.19 / 2021.01.19
  • 1페이지 / fileicon docx (MS워드 2007이상)
  • 평가한 분이 없습니다. (구매금액의 3%지급)
  • 500원
다운로드장바구니
Naver Naver로그인 Kakao Kakao로그인
최대 20페이지까지 미리보기 서비스를 제공합니다.
자료평가하면 구매금액의 3%지급!
이전큰이미지 다음큰이미지
본문내용
In Googles culture, a few simple doctrine rule the company. First one is to focus on the user. The founders believe if they create great products and services, they will be able to manage the rest part of the business. Second, they believed hiring as many talented engineers as possible would make creating great products and services feasible. Third, they gave engineers unprecedented power and freedom to foster creativity and flexibility in their work, and the culture where it is ok to take risks and fail. Another distinctive approach Google took is avoiding traditional management, business structure, and MBA minded structural plans as the founders believed these factors hold the company back and opted for simple process and system. The core element of Googles culture is the unique empowerment given to engineers to produce great service.
On the other hand, as noted in the article, "Our culture of innovation model builds upon dozens of studies by numerous authors," the elements that drive innovative culture described in "How Innovative is Your Company" are well structured and modeled, and study-based. They are comprised of six building blocks: resources, processes, values, behavior, climate, and success. The innovative culture in this article seems to oppose that of Google which takes learning-by-doing approach and avoids having thick business structure. However, the article takes similar approach as Google to the extent that people issues, such as behavior, climate, and values are the most important elements that shapes the culture of innovation.
자료평가
    아직 평가한 내용이 없습니다.
회원 추천자료
  • 미국대학원_과제_애널리틱스, 빅데이터 조직 형성 및 육성_Columbia Univ_Developing Analytics Team
  • Developing an Analytics TeamBackgroundJHP corporation is a manufacturer of industrial products such as centrifugal pumps, compressors, waste water treatment system, and so forth. Being successful in business, the company recently became from midsized company to a large firm. The company hired more sales staff along with employees for other departments, and therefore its production scale also became larger. JHP built more factories and added a new product line that it could not handle before due to the complexity of technology and difficulties in adopting required manufacturing system: gas t

  • 미국대학원_과제_4차 산업 혁명_애널리틱스, 빅데이터 3.0_Columbia Univ_Analytics 3.0 by Tom Davenport
  • Tom Davenport, in “Analytics 3.0,” discusses the distinguishing features of what he calls 3 stages: Analytics 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0. Do you agree or disagree with his characterization, and why or why not? What evidence do you bring to bear on this?The authors characterization in analytical stages are evident. The construction company I worked for in the past, and many of the suppliers I had transactions with fall into somewhere around analytics 1.0. They agree that data analysis is important and utilizes it to some extent. However, they tend to focus their resources more on sales and project

  • 미국대학원_과제_애널리틱스, 빅데이터 사용 주체 및 관련 조직_Columbia Univ_Stakeholders in Analytics
  • Refer to your organization where you are currently located, or to a new role organization you aspire to.What kind of stakeholders might you expect to engage with as an analytics professional in that organization? Cast your net wide as you think about who these people might be and what their interests could be. What strategies are you going to use to influence them?My desired role is a data analyst in an IT and/or manufacturing company. For this role in this type of company, there will be many stakeholders. For example, a manufacturing process team would want to find out ways to improve th

  • 미국대학원_과제_애널리틱스, 빅데이터와 관리_Columbia Univ_Managing Analytics
  • 1. What is your assessment of Hill’s strategies for “Managing Yourself?”The philosophy the approach is based on is very ideal. It makes leaders look back and evaluate themselves, and construct professional relationship between a boss and direct reports. However, Hills managing style is just one of many different kinds. One must not accept this style as an absolute management notion, but as just one option out of many different styles he or she must learn to incorporate. A charismatic, even somewhat authoritarian, leadership can be effective depending on a situation. Not one managing s

  • 미국대학원_과제_애널리틱스, 빅데이터 및 IoT 건설사 사업적용 제안 발표자료_Columbia Univ_Proposal Pitch_IoT and Analytics in Construction
  • The PitchAPAN 57001Problem2Series 1 Column1 Column22012 1.22013 12014 0.772015 0.812016 0.62COMPANY REVENUEProblem3Change In the Market4Internet of Things & AnalyticsOur ActionConstruction Service + Analytics Service5What We NeedFirst Step: OutsourcingSmall Trial + Immediate + Less cost + Knowledge= FAIR GAME6Column18.23.21.41.2 Concluding7Again, WHY?More stable revenue & financial statusAn Industry LeaderStarting with why: People buy why, not how or what. I start my presentation by telling why we need a change.Forming the sense of urgency – 1: I am pro

오늘 본 자료 더보기
  • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
  • 최근 판매 자료
    저작권 관련 사항 정보 및 게시물 내용의 진실성에 대하여 레포트샵은 보증하지 아니하며, 해당 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재·배포는 금지됩니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견시 고객센터에 신고해 주시기 바랍니다.
    사업자등록번호 220-06-55095 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.02-539-9392
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1806호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2003 reoprtshop. steel All reserved.