 |
¹Ì¸®º¸±â·Î Á¦°øµÇ´Â 2ÆäÀÌÁö ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
Science writing heuristic, SWH, science process skills, scientific attitude, interactions, argumen-tation |
| ޱ¸Àû °úÇÐ ±Û¾²±â ¼ö¾÷ÀÌ ÃʵîÇлýÀÇ Å½±¸ ´É·Â°ú °úÇРŵµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ - ÀÚ¿¬°úÇÐ > °úÇб³À° |
| |
| |
| ¿µ¹®ÃÊ·Ï |
| The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of science writing heuristic (SWH) instruction based on Tolumin`s structure of argument, on students` science process skills and scientific attitude. In the instruction, unstructured problems were selected with issues to be argued, in which interactions among students are stressed. This research involved 58 students of 5th grade at an elementary school, and divided them into an experimental group with 29 and a control group with 29. The former was treated with instruction using argumentation as SWH, while the latter with conventional ways of instruction. Science process skills and scientific attitude were compared between the two groups and within each of the groups. The results implied that science instruction using science writing heuristic is effective in improving learning science process skills and scientific attitude. |
| |
| |
| µµ¿ò¸» |
| º» ³í¹®Àº Âü°í¿ë ³í¹®À¸·Î ¼öÁ¤ ¹× ÅØ½ºÆ® º¹»ç°¡ µÇÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù. |
| |
| |
 |
ÀÚ·áÆò°¡ |
|
ÃÑ 0°³ ±ÛÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. |
| Æò°¡Á¡¼ö : |
Æò°¡ÇÑ ºÐÀÌ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
|
|
|
|
¡Ø ¿å¼³, ºñ¹æ±Û, ³»¿ë¾ø´Â ±Û µî ¿î¿µ±âÁØ¿¡ ¾î±ß³ª´Â °æ¿ì ¿¹°í¾øÀÌ »èÁ¦µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
¡Ø ´Ù¿î·Îµå°¡ µÇÁö ¾Ê´Â µî ¼ºñ½º ºÒÆí»çÇ×Àº [°í°´¼¾ÅÍ 1:1 ¹®ÀÇÇϱâ]¿¡ ¹®ÀÇÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. |
|
|
|
|
| ÀÚ·áÆÇ¸Å : kstudy |
|
| ¿À´Ã º» ÀÚ·á |
¿À´Ã º» ÀÚ·á°¡ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù. |
|
| ÀÌ ºÐ¾ß ÀÎ±â ³í¹® |
|
|
| ÀÌ ºÐ¾ß ½Å±Ô ³í¹® |
|
|
| Àå¹Ù±¸´Ï ´ãÀº ÀÚ·á |
Àå¹Ù±¸´Ï¿¡ ´ãÀº ÀÚ·á°¡ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù. |
|
| ÀúÀÛ±Ç Á¤º¸ |
º» Çмú³í¹®Àº Çѱ¹ÇмúÁ¤º¸(ÁÖ)¿Í
°¢ ÇÐȸ°£¿¡ ÀúÀÛ±Ç °è¾àÀÌ Ã¼°áµÈ
°ÍÀ¸·Î ·¹Æ÷Æ®¼¥ÀÌ Á¦°øÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
º» ÀúÀÛ¹°À» ºÒ¹ýÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ¿ë½Ã´Â
¹ýÀûÀÎ Á¦Àç°¡ °¡ÇØÁú ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
|
|
|