국민건강보험 관리(영문)

  • 등록일 / 수정일
  • 페이지 / 형식
  • 자료평가
  • 구매가격
  • 2011.03.23 / 2019.12.24
  • 5페이지 / fileicon docx (MS워드 2007이상)
  • 평가한 분이 없습니다. (구매금액의 3%지급)
  • 1,400원
다운로드장바구니
Naver Naver로그인 Kakao Kakao로그인
최대 20페이지까지 미리보기 서비스를 제공합니다.
자료평가하면 구매금액의 3%지급!
이전큰이미지 다음큰이미지
목차
[ Contents ]
1. What is NHI?
2. History
3. Payment model
4. NHI of Korea
5. Conclusion
본문내용
1) Fee-for-service
Fee-for-service arrangements pay general practitioners based on the service which is decided by particular pay standards. Most of capitalistic country adopted fee-for-service and this is because the market economy is relatively well reflected. They are even more widely used for specialists working in ambulatory care.
There are two ways to set fee levels:
• By individual practitioners.
• Central negotiations (as in Japan, Germany, Canada and in France) or hybrid model (such as in Australia, France's sector 2, and New Zealand) where general practitioners can charge extra fees on top of standardized patient reimbursement rates.
2) Capitation
In capitation payment systems, general practitioners are paid for each patient on their "list", usually with adjustments for factors such as age and gender. According to OECD, "these systems are used in Italy (with some fees), in all four countries of the United Kingdom (with some fees and allowances for specific services), Austria (with fees for specific services), Denmark (one third of income with remainder fee for service), Ireland (since 1989), the Netherlands (fee-for-service for privately insured patients and public employees) and Sweden (from 1994). Capitation payments have become more frequent in “managed care” environments in the United States.”
According to OECD, "Capitation systems allow funders to control the overall level of primary health expenditures, and the allocation of funding among general practitioners is determined by patient registrations. However, under this approach, general practitioners may register too many patients and under-serve them, select the better risks and refer on patients who could have been treated by the general practitioners directly. Freedom of consumer choice over doctors, coupled with the principle of "money following the patient" may moderate some of these risks. Aside from selection, these problems are likely to be less marked than under salary-type arrangements."
3) salary
In several OECD countries, general practitioners are employed on salaries for the government. According to OECD, "Salary arrangements allow funders to control primary care costs directly; however, they may lead to under-provision of services (to ease workloads), excessive referrals to secondary providers and lack of attention to the preferences of patients." There has been movement away from this system.
4) Case Payment
참고문헌
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447690/
2006 ,Munyoung, Association for research on Insurance Business
자료평가
    아직 평가한 내용이 없습니다.
회원 추천자료
오늘 본 자료 더보기
  • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
  • 최근 판매 자료
    저작권 관련 사항 정보 및 게시물 내용의 진실성에 대하여 레포트샵은 보증하지 아니하며, 해당 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재·배포는 금지됩니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견시 고객센터에 신고해 주시기 바랍니다.
    사업자등록번호 220-06-55095 대표.신현웅 주소.서울시 서초구 방배로10길 18, 402호 대표전화.02-539-9392
    개인정보책임자.박정아 통신판매업신고번호 제2017-서울서초-1806호 이메일 help@reportshop.co.kr
    copyright (c) 2003 reoprtshop. steel All reserved.