레포트 (68)
새누리당, 민주통합당, 통합진보당 복지정책 비교(영문)
policies새누리당- larger proportion of welfare, Universal welfare- accepted childcare welfare in terms of labor force expansion related to producing population (national competitiveness)민주통합당- Universal welfare- excessive child nurturing expenses→ dropped birth rate because of economic problems통합진보당- Universal welfareLooking at childcare welfare in terms of eco
24페이지 | 1,900원 | 2013.02.20
Comparative analysis of welfare policies from 3 parties
policies새누리당- larger proportion of welfare, Universal welfare- accepted childcare welfare in terms of labor force expansion related to producing population (national competitiveness)민주통합당- Universal welfare- excessive child nurturing expenses→ dropped birth rate because of economic problems통합진보당- Universal welfareLooking at childcare welfare in terms of eco
24페이지 | 2,300원 | 2016.12.04
policies. In 1996 Tom and KateChappell seriously considered selling Tom’s of Maineto achieve financial freedom and pursue personalinterests. As it turned out, they could not find abuyer willing to continue the company’s way ofdoing business. The Chappells concluded they couldnot sell their business without compromising theirown values, which they were unwilling to do (Chap-pell, 199
12페이지 | 2,000원 | 2023.02.12
policies.2) Duration of low fertility1) Social needs for future human resource investment has increased.Ⅲ. 2013 Childcare benefit5) Supply control through the child care center facilities and the supply of child care teachers to enhance the qualities of long-term policy targets (infants) compared to the population decline, is required.4) Substantiality of the delivery system is needed so t
21페이지 | 1,700원 | 2018.01.18